email:
password:

Register
Forum Stats
Total Threads:
4104

Total Posts:
10050

Top Posters
Michael 2304
Dylan 1805
onemiamibum 710
JennyJM 645
nicole 484
Francisco 301
m1nr 262
Marty 256
dav 199
kyle 176
Fla 155
ultron 146
henryjoebob 142
Xandy 133
manic 127
Jess 124
Sarah 123
Cindy 123
Adam 106
Jessica 104
Random Faqqing
There seem to be lots of things missing or that just plain don't work.
That's not a question. Its a statement. It's an honest mistake to be sure, but maybe its a sign that you should start spending more time thinking about how you might improve yourself and a little less time nitpicking every little detail of any given website.
firefox_logo
idiotechnica.com uses CSS3 and is optimized for viewing in Firefox versions 3+
Source Code

Review By: onemiamibum
Posted On: 04/11/11 05:15 AM
Rating: 3.5

Directorr:
Duncan Jones

Cast:
Jake Gyllenhaal, Michelle Monagahn, Vera Farmiga, Jeffery Wright

Stars:

Finally got around to seeing Source Code. I had expectation jitters, hoping that it would live up to Duncan Jones first film 'Moon'. I really enjoyed Moon, as much for the story and acting as for what they were able to achieve with such a miniscule budget.

This script, like Moon's, is tight. By tight, I mean there is very little that does not directly impact the story or character developmnet. The acting is very good, although there are no Oscar caliber performances here (Sam Rockwell certainly delivered a nomination worthy performance for Moon).

Jake Gyllenhall is Captain Coulter Stevens, a helicopter pilot who only remembers last being stationed in Afghanistan. He wakes up disoriented inside a mechanical pod so claustrophobic that it could be the closet on a submarine. His only contact with the outside world is a TV monitor where a woman in a military uniform feeds him mission information. In a plot remeniscent of 'Twelve Monkeys', he must go back in time to discover who blew up a passenger train. Just like poor Bruce Willis in 'Monkeys', he doesnt get it right the first few times and must go back over and over again to learn tiny bits of information before being blown up with all the other passengers. Every time he goes back he learns more about the train and about how he ended up in the pod.

It would be hard for me to discuss why I feel this didn't turn out to be a superb film without revealing spoilers. I would like to point out that Moon had a budget of $5 million and looked like a $50 million movie. This had a slightly bigger budget with $32 million but still felt like a Class A movie on what Hollywood considers to be a B movie price. I can't wait to see what Jones can do when he gets a real budget; I just hope he's able to keep that movie from looking like the hollywood blockbusting trainwreck that producers think we want to see but are constantly losing money.

It's worth a theater visit, but you're not going to miss any part of the experience by waiting for the rental. 3.5 stars. 3 Stars for story and quality plus a .5 for 'more with less'.
Leave Comment:
Comment
Submit Post

Posts: Movies and Television / Source Code

share this thread on facebook

Posted By: Michael
04/10/11 11:36 PM

good review. ill check it out. i disagree about moon though. i thought it was weak and predictable. i didn't think it was a bad movie overall, just nothing spectacular. I remember i saw the trailer and had the whole movie pegged and you told me i was wrong, but when i watched it i wasnt wrong. i was dead on balls accurate.
Posted By: onemiamibum
04/11/11 12:20 AM

Is that the first time you ever found out I lied to you?


I considered it an experiment. By having you question the way you thought it was going to end did it make the experience more or less satisfying than what you thought the experience would be if you knew you had the ending right? I have purposely worded this post in the format of an election question.
Posted By: Michael
04/11/11 12:43 AM

i was annoyed.
Posted By: dav
04/11/11 03:21 AM

i thought it was closer to groundhog day, with the main difference being that 'source code' didn't intend to be funny, but was so bad, i couldn't stop laughing. 1 star, for being so awful that i enjoyed it.