email:
password:

Register
Forum Stats
Total Threads:
4104

Total Posts:
10050

Top Posters
Michael 2304
Dylan 1805
onemiamibum 710
JennyJM 645
nicole 484
Francisco 301
m1nr 262
Marty 256
dav 199
kyle 176
Fla 155
ultron 146
henryjoebob 142
Xandy 133
manic 127
Jess 124
Sarah 123
Cindy 123
Adam 106
Jessica 104
Random Faqqing
What does Beta mean and how long will idiotechnica.com be in it?
Beta is a fancy schmancy technical term that means: We do not want to take any responsibility for the quality of our software at this time. Idiotechnica will always be in beta.
firefox_logo
idiotechnica.com uses CSS3 and is optimized for viewing in Firefox versions 3+

Posts: General / It didnt work so well for Doctor Octopus

share this thread on facebook

onemiamibum Post Author Photo: onemiamibum
It didnt work so well for Doctor Octopus
04/28/10 10:41 AM

http://www.cnn.com/2010/T.../index.html?hpt=C1

"Scientists" are attempting to create a star in a lab........to solve the energy crisis.

'If all goes well, the resulting reaction will be hotter than the center of the sun (more than 100 million degrees Celsius) and will exert more pressure than 100 billion atmospheres. This will smash the hydrogen isotopes together with so much force and heat that their nuclei will fuse, sending off energy and neutrons.

Voila. An itty-bitty star is born.'

Can't we experiment with this shit in another solar system somewhere.
Offline
Post ID: 6686

nicole Post Author Photo: nicole
04/28/10 12:53 PM

doctoapus lol
Offline
Post ID: 6688

kyle Post Author Photo: kyle
04/28/10 05:23 PM

Mildly interesting side note: I applied there recently.

Also, why did you put scientists in quotes?
Offline
Post ID: 6691

Michael Post Author Photo: Michael
04/28/10 05:38 PM

kyle: Mildly interesting side note: I applied there recently. Also, why did you put scientists in quotes?





because the jury is still out on "science"

Offline
Post ID: 6693

onemiamibum Post Author Photo: onemiamibum
04/28/10 05:40 PM

kyle:
Mildly interesting side note: I applied there recently.

Also, why did you put scientists in quotes?



because the other scientists in the article questioned the practicality of these experiments. Not necessarily because I think they don't know what they're doing.
Offline
Post ID: 6694

nicole Post Author Photo: nicole
04/28/10 08:29 PM

My best friend actually worked on pieces of glass for this. I don't really know a lot about it but he worked in an optics lab.
Offline
Post ID: 6696

kyle Post Author Photo: kyle
04/28/10 09:00 PM

onemiamibum:


because the other scientists in the article questioned the practicality of these experiments. Not necessarily because I think they don't know what they're doing.



Practicality is for pussies. There wasn't much reason for us to land on the moon, but fuck that noise, we did it anyways, 'cus we're Americans (fuck yea).
Offline
Post ID: 6698

onemiamibum Post Author Photo: onemiamibum
04/28/10 10:13 PM

kyle:


Practicality is for pussies. There wasn't much reason for us to land on the moon, but fuck that noise, we did it anyways, 'cus we're Americans (fuck yea).


I think thats a silly statement. The purpose of landing on the moon was to test if we had the technology to visit another body. Visiting another body included so many variables that until we tested our theories we wernt sure it was going to work. now so much of what we learned seems obvious, but back then we didnt know shit.
Offline
Post ID: 6699

Francisco Post Author Photo: Francisco
my sexual bravado has increased exponentially
04/28/10 10:51 PM

i hope they succeed, imagine never paying for electricity. mmm. ENERGY!!!!
Offline
Post ID: 6700

kyle Post Author Photo: kyle
04/29/10 08:38 PM

onemiamibum:

I think thats a silly statement. The purpose of landing on the moon was to test if we had the technology to visit another body. Visiting another body included so many variables that until we tested our theories we wernt sure it was going to work. now so much of what we learned seems obvious, but back then we didnt know shit.



The purpose of creating this laser is to test if we have the capability to harness fusion on Earth. That is a far more meaningful test, as far as humanity is concerned. Mind you the Apollo project ended up costing a little more than $25 billion (as reported to congress in 1973), compared to this "limitless energy" project which has only consumed $2 billion thus far. In my opinion, even if this project exceed the Apollo budget, it's well worth it. $25 billion is less than ~0.3% of the US FY budget. Spread that over a decade or two and well, damn, that's hardly anything.
Offline
Post ID: 6714